Introduction
As operating costs continue to rise, lobster fishers are scrutinising every aspect of their process. One key question is whether modern solutions like the Bait Saviour system can truly deliver more cost savings than traditional baiting methods.
Traditional Baiting: Pros & Cons
- Pros:Low upfront costs (basic traps and bait are relatively inexpensive).Familiar process (no need for training).
- Cons:High ongoing costs from wasted bait.Multiple trips to sea to rebait, increasing fuel and labour costs.Higher environmental impact.
Bait Saviour System: Pros & Cons
- Pros: Protects bait from early scavenging, with potential bait savings of up to 75% depending on conditions. A bespoke preset delay can reduce unnecessary rebaiting trips. The container is depth-rated to 183 metres.
- Considerations: The initial investment is higher than a standard bait bag. Choose the delay that suits your usual soak pattern when ordering, since it is programmed into the unit before delivery.
Which Saves More Money Overall?
In most cases, fishers discover that the Bait Saviour system’s operational savings quickly offset the initial cost, leading to substantially lower expenses in the long run. By mitigating bait waste, fuel usage, and pot checks, the system offers a more predictable and efficient way to manage resources.
Conclusion
Comparing traditional baiting methods to the Bait Saviour system reveals that while the latter may have a steeper upfront cost, the long-term savings are considerable. If you’re looking to future-proof your lobster fishing operation and cut down on unnecessary expenditure, the Bait Saviour system stands out as the more cost-effective choice.