Bait Saviour System vs. Traditional Baiting: Which Saves More Money?

Introduction

As operating costs continue to rise, lobster fishers are scrutinising every aspect of their process. One key question is whether modern solutions like the Bait Saviour system can truly deliver more cost savings than traditional baiting methods.

Traditional Baiting: Pros & Cons

• Pros:

  • Low upfront costs (basic traps and bait are relatively inexpensive).

  • Familiar process (no need for training).

• Cons:

  • High ongoing costs from wasted bait.

  • Multiple trips to sea to rebait, increasing fuel and labour costs.

  • Higher environmental impact.

Bait Saviour System: Pros & Cons

• Pros:

  • Significant Bait Efficiency: Reduces bait consumption by 50–75%.

  • Time & Fuel Savings: Fewer boat trips required, cutting fuel costs by up to 50%.

  • Precision Control: Wireless programming and minute-level scheduling provide optimal bait release.

  • Long-Term Durability: Designed to withstand harsh marine conditions at depths up to 183 metres.

• Cons:

  • Higher initial investment than standard traps.

  • Requires a short learning curve to master the wireless and scheduling features.

Which Saves More Money Overall?

In most cases, fishers discover that the Bait Saviour system’s operational savings quickly offset the initial cost, leading to substantially lower expenses in the long run. By mitigating bait waste, fuel usage, and pot checks, the system offers a more predictable and efficient way to manage resources.

Conclusion

Comparing traditional baiting methods to the Bait Saviour system reveals that while the latter may have a steeper upfront cost, the long-term savings are considerable. If you’re looking to future-proof your lobster fishing operation and cut down on unnecessary expenditure, the Bait Saviour system stands out as the more cost-effective choice.